Showing posts with label bullies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bullies. Show all posts

March 26, 2010

Sean’s ADHD, Part 4: Sticks and Stones

sticksandstones04negative
In my many posts about ADHD, and many other kinds of behavior issues as well, I have described cases in which a lot of the things a kid did looked just like the kind of things that a kid with ADHD would do. (It is for this reason, I suspect, that so many kids get diagnosed with ADHD and get prescribed medication.) Sometimes another doctor will send the child to me because they have ‘failed’ treatment with standard ADHD medication. Careful, patient, and thorough investigation often shows me that the child’s attention problem is actually caused by unappreciated anxiety, unseen depression, itchy skin or itchy eyes, a vision or hearing problem, or a bully.

Some aspects of attention are driven from within us. In order to accomplish any task, we have to shut out sensory inputs from the world. There are many medical studies that show fairly conclusively that multitasking is a simple delusion. We don’t really focus on driving and talking on the phone and sipping our coffee all at the same time. We actually do them in sequence, one after another. Because we’re not spending a visible amount of time on one before moving on to another, the sequence is invisible and it gives the illusion of simultaneous action. In every waking moment, we multitask in the same way. We walk and talk, we look where we’re going, we keep our pants from falling down. (When people get impaired in some way, they stumble.)

In Sean’s case, I thought he clearly had some attention and hyperactivity issues. He will have to learn to restrain some of his impulses in certain situations--such as a classroom. He also needs to be respectful of teachers, even if they aren’t the best. But when I asked him about bullies, he denied this problem. Now I realize that I hadn’t considered the possibility that the bully could be his teacher.

His mom asked him if what the other parent wrote in the email was true. He confirmed all of it.

Even without physical violence, this is abuse. Sean didn’t know or understand that a teacher could be wrong, or could do something wrong. So when Mr. Dickson called him a ‘rotten child,’ he didn’t take it as an insult. He understood it to be a professional assessment, like a B+ grade, or advice that he needed to practice his arithmetic. Since he now understood himself to be a rotten child, he realized that this new identity afforded him a freedom from behavior boundaries that he had not had before.

The rhyme about sticks and stones is simply a lie. It is irresponsible to teach it to your child as a defense. It is curious to me that parents will teach this to their children as if they believed it to be true. Given, part of being an adult is knowing when not to respond to hostility or an insult, when to simply keep your feelings to yourself, when to appear noncommittal when you really do have strong feelings. Most people, maybe everyone, has lost friends, relationships, jobs and many other important things because of words. Believe as we do in freedom of speech, there is no freedom from feeling hurt by speech. If your son struggles in school, and a sibling called him stupid, what would you do? Would you teach him about sticks and stones? Is that doing your job? I’ll come back to this.

When a teacher, and especially a parent, gives a negative assessment of the way a child is, a scar is made.

There are 2 important points here. If your kid messes up, you don’t have to go through some self-effacing nonsense--just tell them how it is. It’s OK to tell them they are wrong, that they must never play with daddy’s drafting equipment, that they are not allowed into the street without holding a grown-up’s hand. You must never tell them that they are stupid, unattractive, incompetent, or that they speak funny. Never tell them that they are rotten kids—save this one for your toast at their weddings. Never even hint that you wish they weren’t born, or wish they were more like one of their siblings or cousins.

In a work environment, there’s a big difference between hearing an assessment that you need to improve the way you organize the files and hearing that you are disorganized. One is a skill you need to improve, and can try to improve. The other is a label that is permanently attached to you.

The second point is how you deal with the bullies in your child’s life.

In the movies, the caring father teaches the child boxing or martial arts, so that when threatened, the on-screen David can beat up a schoolyard Goliath, humiliating him or her and inducing a catharsis in the ticket-buyer powerful enough to provoke tears. While I have often admired the positive impact on a child when they study martial arts, for example, real life never, ever has worked like this even once. If there’s a child threatening your kid, physically or emotionally, are you going to sign the kid up for lessons? How many years will that take? And then when the bully gets the desired reaction, and your kid finally explodes with the righteous justice of any number of action movies, who will be suspended from school? What will the lesson be about fairness and right and wrong? When the bully is an authority figure, who does the child have who could compete with that? Who is more powerful than a teacher or a school principal who tells your kid that he is some kind of delinquent? Only you can fill this role.

It could indeed make the child’s school life more uncomfortable if you intervene on your child’s behalf. But that child will be with you long after this school term is a bad memory. Step up to the plate on the child’s side, and they will remember it for decades. If you don’t, they will remember just as long. Don’t measure your success by whether the child gets a new teacher, or is being sent to the principal’s office. Your success is in your relationship with your children, who have acquired the secure knowledge that you’re always there for them, you’re always going to stand by them against the bullies of the world.



January 19, 2010

Hurting Mommy

I’m a worrier.  I worry about the patients I see and their families.  It comes with the job, I guess.  After all, part or much of a doctor’s job is to see people when they are sick or otherwise out of sorts, and try and make it better.  Make them better.  Maybe fix something that’s broken.  So I suppose it’s natural enough to worry about the things I can’t or don’t know how to fix.

Almost a year ago, I wrote about a toddler who couldn’t stop hitting mommy.  I could frame the situation in a logical way, since a new baby had just joined the family.  I thought that helping the mother see my interpretation of what was going on would relieve her of her feeling of failure as a parent, and it would give us a logical path for intervention.  It did on both counts.  I suggested that she spend extra time with the older sibling, on a rigidly scheduled basis so that the child could come to depend on the attention, rather than feel she had to fight for it.  It was insightful and helpful, and it worked.

I reviewed that post before starting this one.  At the bottom, in a smaller font, I provided a hedge against anybody thinking that I claimed having a magic formula to child behavior that works with everybody.  I’m glad to say that despite being one of the go-to people around here for difficult kids, I’ve only seen a very few who really seemed to like being difficult.


Albert came to the office today with his mother, to say goodbye.  He’s 30-months now, and he’s big for his age.  A year ago, when his mother first brought him, she cried easily.  She asked me how to manage him without hitting him.  I listened carefully to the situation she described.  Having recently moved here from out of state, she was isolated without friends or relatives.  She joined various parent/child groups.  Everyone was very nice, she said, but her little boy was so aggressive with the other children that the other parents didn’t want to get together with her.  She was alone with him all day, every day.  His father worked long hours at the new job, and came home late.  He had grown up in another country, in another culture, and didn’t think there was a problem.  Whenever he played with Albert, the child was always happy and active.  He told his wife explicitly that if there were a problem, it must be her, since Albert was just fine when he was with his dad.  Today, at 2 ½, I’m not really sure how much dad has been with him alone.  I have never met the man.

(OK, there’s obviously more than a child behavior issue here.  One of the many advantages of the conventional method of providing medical services (like at my own doctor:  6 minutes after 50 minutes of waiting; I get to ask maybe one question before the guy is out the door heading for the next patient; nothing is explained; often no exam of any kind takes place; I’m not sure he knows my name) is that the doctor can remain completely unconnected to the patient.  Time, or the lack of it, is a great insulator between people.  I spent hours with this mother and child over the last year.  She did better, she felt better.  I just couldn’t fix the structural issues of her life.  But I worried about her.)

My exam rooms have toys in them.  I have heard about—no, I have also seen—pediatric offices that don’t have toys in the rooms.  While it’s certainly less to keep clean, it seems to send a message.  Albert was getting bored quickly as his mom and I talked.  For just such occasions, I have a small inventory of double-secret toys, which often will engage even a finicky kid’s interest.  As any good magician will tell you, the patter is more important than it appears.  I make a show of reluctantly taking out my special and treasured toys.  Today it was a battery-driven hamster in a plastic ball.  Nicely designed, the ball’s relationship with the driving wheels of the hamster were asymmetric enough to redirect the device if it ran in to an obstacle.  In this way, it would keep going unpredictably until the batteries ran out (yes, I use rechargeables).

Another stroke of Dr. Wolffe magic!  Albert was completely enthralled for...maybe a couple of minutes.
 
When kids his age get bored, they ask for something, they whine about stuff, they interrupt.  Albert picked up the little gizmo and threw it to the floor as hard as he could.  The plastic sphere, which is designed to come apart in order to turn the hamster on and off, came apart.  I picked up the separated (not broken) sphere to put it back together for him.  Angrily, he tried to pull it out of my hands.  Hold on, I said, I’m trying to put it together.  He looked really mad and then, as hard as he could, hit his mother. 

This was new, even to me.  “Don’t hit your mother!” I said in my most serious voice.  He kept trying to strike her, but she deflected his blows.  He smoothly moved his head to her leg and started to bite her.  “NO!”  I said and physically lifted him to the other side of the small room and placed him on the floor.  He looked at me coldly, nearly expressionless.  He turned to his mother and started crying, sort of.  He needs your comfort, I told her, and she went to pick him up.  He started hitting her again.  “You can’t allow him to hit you.  Or hit anybody,” I said.  We started to talk about hitting.  He went to the little container of stuffed animals and one by one took them out and threw them at his mother’s head.

I need to stop this story, since I know his mom will read it and I don’t want to hurt her feelings.  She’s a smart, warm person who is not incompetent as a parent.  I respect her and like her.  My extensive experience with difficult children reinforces my reluctance to walk a day in her shoes.

Does it tell you something that the child hit mom when he was frustrated with me?  Most kids, even at this age, are socialized enough to keep their most egregious behavior out of the view of strangers.  I don’t believe he could think that hitting his mother was acceptable, and certainly not in front of me.  That he felt completely at ease about it is kind of chilling.  This was not about attention, not about having to share a parent with a new baby sibling.  He had certainly come to take mom for granted, since he knew she was going to be there with him no matter what he did.  But it bothers me that he kept pushing the envelope in this difficult, aggressive direction.  I worry that it’s not a typical instinct.

For his mother, I think there are guidelines that generally apply:
  • Be the grown-up.
  • If you let your child hurt you, you are permitting him to hurt others.
  • Is this what you want your kid to be?  (The nonsense that pop psychology projected onto bullies for decades was that they suffered as much as the victims, and had low self-esteem.  That is and has always been crap.  In fact, the latest research on bullies confirms what I thought when I was in elementary school (and medical school)—they are happy, and have high self-esteem. ) 

At Albert’s age, the key to extinguishing a problem behavior is immediate disengagement and feedback.  Don’t punish him—he won’t remember the transgression and will simply interpret your punishment as arbitrary and mean on your part.  This can lead to an escalating problem.  A dramatic NO! or brief sentence will do.  No hitting! or No kicking!  Then remove the child from the activity.  If they do it again, remove again with the same brief message.  Don’t interact with the child or engage in conversation, don’t lecture the kid.  It’s not supposed to be fun.  But as soon as the tide turns, you need to be there, as ever, with open arms.  Every child can learn to get mom’s attention in a better way.

Ironically enough, I think that part of parenthood is loving our children despite the many little ways they hurt us, whether intentionally or not. 

Albert and his family are moving away, close to his mom’s family.  I really hope that she will get a lot more support and help.  But I’m a worrier, and I will worry about her.  I hope she stays in touch.