Showing posts with label teenagers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label teenagers. Show all posts

July 16, 2010

Anxiety—College Boy Problems

handicapped sign
Before I met with Peter, the 21-year old college boy with anxiety, I asked his parents if there was anything they were concerned about. He said, “Well, it would be great if he were a little more outgoing.” I hadn’t seen the boy in a couple of years and didn’t really know him well since he didn’t go to the doctor much. Was he shy?

An hour or so later, with them waiting patiently outside the exam room, I knew he had a full-blown anxiety disorder. Many people have some anxiety in certain situations, like public speaking. Some people have more focused anxiety about specific things, like spiders or heights. Some have anxiety about things that they themselves know intellectually to be fairly harmless to most other people, such as a fear of balloons. Some fears are so unusual that the person is able to talk about them freely, and knows that they are not an issue for everyone else they have ever met, but the fear is quite real to them. Perhaps a great thing about the internet is that it can give this last group of people the ability to connect with the 1 or 2 or 5 other people who share their unusual problem. By example, there is a community, of sorts, for those with a fear of buttons.

He lived at home with his parents. There’s nothing wrong with that, of course. His parents were nice people and nice to him. And they never threatened to kick him out. They probably never would. That’s a nice thing, too.

But he never indicated that there might be advantages to living away from his parents. More than that, he couldn’t fathom why anybody his age would want to move away from home. It wasn’t like he was so emotionally tied to his parents. I had spoken with them, though not about him. They went on vacation, sometimes camping. They went out to the movies sometimes. Most of the time, I learned from Peter, he never wanted to go. I could picture a dysfunctional relationship in which he didn’t want them to leave, but he never objected. He was most comfortable just staying at home. Alone.

He wasn’t psychotic about his anxiety. He didn’t believe (or say he believed) that if he rode the bus then the world would end by a volcano emerging under his suburban town just as a meteor hit the earth causing an rip in the space-time continuum which would provide an attack opportunity for the Monsters from the Id.

Still, I had a bad feeling about where this was heading. Unlike the College Girl I had seen just a day before, he was not tortured by his anxiety. He knew that others weren’t as concerned as he was about many things, but the way he thought was obvious. Every unusual fear was completely reasonable, and he was almost bemused about the mad foolishness he witnessed around him. To him, our riding in vehicles of all kinds appeared like those who walk tightropes over great gorges. He saw that people did it, that they could do it regularly, but you’d have to be positively nuts actually to try it.

This is also how he saw the pursuit of human relationships. This was another big difference with the College Girl. She didn’t have a boyfriend and wanted one. She absolutely did understand why her peers were in or wanted to be in a relationship. She also understood what was keeping her from achieving this goal. She perceived her anxiety as a handicap that she hated, a roadblock she was desperate to overcome and was so far unsuccessful at doing so.

Was he really forthcoming with me? Like every patient, he was entitled to his privacy and owed me no explanation. Some doctors, I know, think that if a patient isn’t open about something, or if a patient fabricates something, then they can’t or shouldn’t help them. It’s certainly an impediment to treatment when a person doesn’t seem to respond to medication that they say they are taking but aren’t. But mostly if patients want me to give them my best advice and they want advice based on some hypothetical situation, that’s what I and they will be stuck with.

Is this denial? Once I saw a child who had been in and out of emergency rooms at least 4 or 5 times over several months. Every time the family went in with him, he had trouble breathing. He was given breathing treatments and medication and sent home to follow up with his primary care physician. They didn’t give him the medication, didn’t make the follow up appointments. They needed a form filled out for school, and the doctor told them that the child had asthma and would benefit from better control of his symptoms. They changed doctors, and came to the practice where I used to work. I told them their child had asthma and would benefit from better control of his symptoms. He went to the ER again, then they asked for their records to be transferred to another practice.

Is it my job to puncture his denial, if it is? Is it my role to judge his life decisions as somehow inadequate, as incompatible with happiness? Is my definition of happiness and success as an adult a reasonable goal? There are societal norms, of course, and he was aware of these. Marriage, family, work, kids, and so on. Certainly here in one of the epicenters of alternative lifestyles, there aren’t a lot of choices that wouldn’t be tolerated. Besides, I lived in Utah for 3 years. In ways that I appreciate more from a distance—topographical, chronological, and metaphorical—some of those people were very much willing to do a lot to live outside of the mainstream. Whether in shallow swamps of consanguine genes or in isolated heavily-armed bunkers waiting for the race-war end-of-times, they were going to do it their way.

Let me be explicit about some of the ethical issues associated with this case.

1. If the patient doesn’t think it’s a problem, is it a problem? Before there were Wall Street executives who didn’t take any responsibility in their congressional testimony, there was a panel of Tobacco CEOs who swore under oath that they didn’t believe that smoking caused health problems. That seemed sleazy and dishonest. But if a patient says that they are just fine with what they are doing, does it matter if they are in denial or are out of touch with reality?  Does the doctor have an obligation to do more than educate, inform, and offer help?

2. Is Peter hurting anyone else by his inattention to his anxiety disorder? Sure, his parents had dreams for him that might be difficult to achieve. But who among us has parents who have always thought that we would be exactly who we are now? I am, to be blunt, worried that what appears typical enough at the moment—a college kid living at home while attending a decent and popular local institution—could become more cumbersome as the years go by. Do his parents deserve a life of their own, without their kids? Do their kids owe them the freedom gained by moving the heck out of the house at some point? And the parents aren’t my patient, so should I care what they need?

3. I want to repeat that last part. The parents aren’t my patient. This is an easy issue for some of the patients I see. I have a patient who’s nearly 30 now, severely developmentally delayed. I have autistic kids who are technically autistic adults. It’s an easy issue for them because they have legal guardians and decision-makers. Not Peter—he’s warm and smart and going to college. But in some ways, obviously from these essays, I think of him as having a handicap. It’s not politically-correct, I know, to use that term at all. But there’s something about him, that is with him in every setting, that often interferes with his achievement of some of his own goals. It interferes, in my professional opinion, with his ability to meet some criteria of independent—if not happy, perhaps—adulthood. The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 says a covered disability is a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity. What, if anything, should I tell his parents? That their kid is sick and needs to have medication spiked into his orange juice? I want to tell them everything. They are his best advocates, they know something isn’t right. He gets along well with them. Shouldn’t they be there to encourage him to seek the help I think he needs? A lot of parents read this, and would probably agree. But what about when you were 20—would you have wanted your doctor calling your parents?

July 13, 2010

Anxiety--College Boy

bart-map
Peter was at college here in Berkeley, and needed a physical exam form filled out for a summer job he had applied for. He came in with his parents. I asked them if they were worried about anything in particular and they said that he had been very healthy. But they wished he'd get out more. Maybe be a little more...outgoing. He looked very relieved when his parents left the room.

"Gosh," I said, "I thought they'd never leave!" He smiled briefly. I asked how college was going, if he had a major.

He said, politely enough, looking at the floor, "It's going OK. Don't have a major." Didn't I recall that he was interested in Economics? "Yes, but I didn't get a good feeling from those people." Meaning, I took it, from those in that department. How about people in other departments? I told him I thought there was a lot to be said about finding a group where you feel like you fit in. "Maybe, but I don't fit in." Still no eye contact.

"You haven't made a lot of new friends?"

"None, really."

"Are you in touch with your friends from high school?"

"I had two friends in high school but they are going to college in Hayward [Cal State]." It is a sad fact of suburban life that the logistics of socialization are often very cumbersome for children. (This is very different from my experience growing up where public transport was great and cheap.) But he was 21, not 14. What about borrowing a car from his parents? "I don't drive."

"Why not? Didn't they have driver education in your high school?"

"Yes but I stopped taking it after the first day. It was just too dangerous." But his mom and dad drove, I pointed out. "But I won't drive with them at night. Anything could happen. No," he added for emphasis, "I definitely don't want to drive."

Most 16-year-olds have, at least in their minds, cut from magazines the photos of the cars they want to have. A car, or access to one, or even without access but having a driving license, meant adulthood, liberation from the control of their parents, freedom. Most American teenagers have much clearer dreams of owning their own car than they have of owning their own home someday. I think that this is less prevalent among those growing up in urban settings. (A wealthy high-school classmate of mine had his own car, but I don't know where he drove it (let alone parked it) and neither I nor most of my other classmates were envious.) But this is California, where having a car or wanting one is or should be considered an essential developmental milestone, like walking or potty training. When he said that he didn't want to learn to drive, whatever alarms were not already ringing for me started to go off. "What about going to Hayward on BART?" [Bay Area Rapid Transit--a not very extensive system, but fast and reasonably comfortable and clean.  And ] I knew he lived in a town with a station.

"That goes under the Bay!" he explained as if I has somehow been misinformed about this fact.  But it didn't between Berkeley and Hayward.

At some point, I stood up to wash my hands and examine him. I went to put my stethoscope on his chest, but stopped. "Gosh, Peter. Have you been gardening? Working with paint solvents?" His hands were red, very dry-looking and irritated. He denied this but said that he washed his hands a lot. Mine were not so raw, and I typically washed them 20 times a day, sometimes more.

"I know. I'm a bit of a germophobe."

He was attending college locally. So I asked him if BART was uncomfortable for him, why wasn’t it a problem taking the public transit bus to school?  He told me that he walked to his college campus, about 3 miles or so from his home. He admitted that not using public transportation was a real barrier to making and sustaining new friendships at college.

Continuing in this line, I was worried about what would come next. As I would ask any patient his age, I asked if he was dating anyone. I assumed that this would be logistically difficult for him, given his transportation constraints. He said he wasn’t in a way that concerned me. Sometimes I get a disappointed response, when the college kid wished they were dating somebody. Sometimes it’s a blissful yes they are. He looked at me at me with an odd expression of confusion. Now I was confused about why he was confused. I asked him to clarify what he was thinking.

He told me that he wasn’t dating and convincingly claimed not to know why people did. Let me be really clear here:  I asked about just dating, nothing more intimate. Yes, he knew classmates in high school went on dates or wanted to and talked about it.  He knew they did in college. I asked if he knew how his parents met. Like most of us, their relationship started with dating. But he didn’t really see why people did this. There were so many obstacles that he pointed out. Getting together in a certain place and time, which is a key part of the definition of a ‘date,’ is very difficult if one of the people has to be within walking distance of their home. Holding hands seemed unappealing to him, and kissing appeared positively unhygienic. I asked if he would like someday to have a family of his own and a mate. He said that he would but he didn’t know and couldn’t picture what kind of a person that would be or how he would get to there from where he was.

I spent about an hour with him, much of it trying to figure out the level of isolation to which he was willing to subject himself.

I told him he had anxiety. I recommended many things, including trying some medication. I was willing to work with him in any way that I could. He was willing to commit only to think about these choices, or if he wanted to do anything at all. So deeply did he see his perspective as an accurate view of the world that he didn’t see it as a problem in his life. I asked about continuing to live with his parents, and he didn’t see a problem with that, or limiting for school or work to a walking-radius around his parents’ house in Berkeley. Gently, I tried to point out that it might be difficult to meet somebody under these circumstances, but he was blind to this. He didn’t try to reconcile his dream of having a family with his disinterest in looking for somebody with whom to start that family.

July 7, 2010

Anxiety—College Girl

Not feeling well for a weekend, getting through a really busy spell in your work, maybe just being exhausted and not getting a good night's sleep. Those are common reasons why people stop their regular daily exercise routine. It's not like they make a decision that the exercise they've been doing isn't a good idea, or even that they hadn't been enjoying it. But somehow the routine is broken. It's really hard to get started again. When you do restart, what came easily when you stopped is really difficult. It will take time to work up to your former level of fitness.

I got unusually tired and wasn't feeling well. My closest friend called and told me she had cancer.  Suddenly, the effort that was required to keep this up just didn't seem so important. A series of moving patient encounters, together with a surprising amount of encouragement from readers both locally and around the world combined to get me off my lazy behind. My 2-month sabbatical from this blog, I hope, is over.


anxiety acres
Jessica came to my office by herself last week.  She was 18 now, and starting college.  She’s been seeing me since she was a girl, and though I knew we got along well enough, I never got the feeling that she was entirely comfortable.  This visit might be the first time I saw her without her mother.  She had always been thin, but my perceptive assistant noted to me that she had lost about 10 pounds since the last time she’d been in the office.

She said that she wanted me to take a look at something on the skin of her leg.  It had started as a bump a few weeks ago, about the size, she said, of a ‘mosquito bite.’  Maybe it was a little itchy at first, but she didn’t remember it being very annoying.  After some time, she wasn’t exactly sure how long, the bump went away and an area of the surrounding skin on her leg was red.  It wasn’t painful or bothersome.  Over the last couple of days, the redness has decreased and there was a very small amount of skin peeling.  When I asked, she said that it looked like it was getting better.  It didn’t hurt, itch, burn, bleed, ooze, or interfere with anything she did or wore.  I asked to see it.  A little above her knee was an area about the size of a quarter with some faint pinkness and a few skin flakes.  I asked if I could touch it, and found that it wasn’t warm, firm, soft, raised, or bumpy.  She said that it didn’t hurt when I touched or pressed on it.  There were no other such lesions on her.  I was not very worried about it, whatever it was originally—and told her so.  She should call right away, however, if it didn’t continue to improve a little every day. 

I will inject as an aside that I believe the rapport that a patient—even a little kid—has with her doctor can be really important.  It is very hard to establish that relationship with 6-minute visits.  There are lots of other impediments established by current care standards.  If you see a different doctor every time, if the doctor never seems interested in other symptoms you might be living with, if you’re made to feel like just another hot-stamped drop-shipped cog delivered through optimized just-in-time-supply-chain management into the inflexible assembly line of efficient health care designed to achieve least-common-denominator-acceptable outcomes for your particular diagnosis code in order to achieve maximal reimbursement from a 3rd-party-payer at whose toll-free-number you cannot ever reach a human, then you probably won’t really feel relaxed with your doctor.  My patients of all ages, I hope, know that’s not how I work.

So when I told her to call right away if it didn’t improve, my hand was not on the doorknob.  I didn’t even stand up to go.  I simply asked her, “What else hurts?”

“Nothing much,” she said thoughtfully.  “I mean, you know, except for the stomach aches.”  I resisted the urge to smack myself in the head.  Only gradually had I come to realize that bald as I am, a good smack might leave a red mark that could last an afternoon.  Somehow, it was not as satisfying to smack myself on, for example, the ankle.  I didn’t say or do anything except pay attention.  “Sometimes they’re really bad.”  With that her eyes filled with tears and so did mine.  The exam rooms are stocked with tissues, but only one box.  We shared.

She had been having abdominal pain for at least several months.  It was very worrisome for her.  She was afraid she had an ulcer caused by her anxiety.  Anxiety?  Forget the mosquito bite—what happened to the abdominal pain? 

About an hour later, I had learned that she had a couple of jobs that she couldn’t keep because of her anxiety about many, many things.  She had no problem with the academics of college but being in a classroom was a problem and if the classroom were filled with busy, social, chatting, comfortable peers it was an awful experience.   She had sought professional help for this, I was relieved to learn.  But the medication she was prescribed wasn’t helping her—and she was afraid of bringing this up.  I offered to make that call, but she declined for now.  She felt hopeless about the anxiety because the medication didn’t work.  She said that she was worried that her abdominal pain could be something serious.  Right after she said that, she said that it’s her fault because she probably has an ulcer that’s caused by her anxiety.

Here’s what I told her.  Neither the anxiety nor the abdominal pain were her fault.  This I backed up with a short neurophysiologic explanation of how the amygdala communicating with the prefrontal cortex can give the uncomfortable sensations associated with anxiety.  I told her that though it does indeed seem like she has an anxiety disorder, people with anxiety disorders can get just as sick as people without. 

I explained the curious history of peptic ulcer disease.  For more than 100 years, an entire field of medical knowledge was based on the belief that it was somehow caused by intense or anxious or angry or unstable personalities.  Idioms like Type-A Personality entered the daily lexicon largely based on this medical belief.  It was all crap.  Ulcers are usually caused by a bacterial infection in the stomach, which is typically successfully treated with antibiotics and Pepto-Bismol.  (Even happy little kids can get ulcers, by the way, though this is quite unusual.)

I told her that it would be a medical error to assume that her anxiety had been the cause of her symptoms.  It didn’t help, of course.  But I suggested an alternative way of looking at her pain.  Suppose there were some reasonable explanation for the pain and other symptoms that she described.  Maybe when the pain was bad, she would become worried about it and if it were something serious.  This, I pointed out explicitly, would be just how people without an anxiety disorder would think about it.  If the pain continued, a person would be increasingly worried.  As the worry increased, their senses would be focused on the pain, observing it carefully for changes.  With this concentration, continued pain would be sharply perceived and the worry would just continue in an accelerating spiral.  She had not looked at it that way.  Besides, I said, I would really like to relieve that pain if I could.  She deserved and needed the workup I would do for any young woman with chronic abdominal pain.

I informed her that though she might not have been helped by her treatment so far, there are many other treatments available.  None of them works with everybody, but all of them work with some people.  There’s at least a dozen medications she hasn’t tried.  Has she tried a workbook?  She said she had one but she didn’t want to do it because it might not help.  She had not seen that she was too anxious to try an anxiety treatment.  Maybe yoga, maybe hypnosis, I suggested.  She hadn’t thought of those.  I didn’t promise to make her better.  But I promised I would try and I wouldn’t give up.  I don’t know if that will be enough, but it’s all I had to offer.  Well, that and calling the shrink.  For now, I’m working on the stomach aches.

By complete coincidence I have had a series of patients with anxiety issues.  Maybe there were more of them out there than I knew about, and maybe I wasn’t asking enough or the right questions.  With teenagers, I screen everyone for depression.  I get the feeling that’s not enough.  I’ll write more about these young people.

The poster pictured above, stolen from the internet, is from a movie I have not seen.   It’s apparently being shown as a double feature with Libidoland, by the same filmmakers.  Not sure what to make of that.  The tag line for Anxiety Acres is:  “When Casey moved Kevin to the country, she hoped he’d find peace and quiet; instead he found new things to worry about: zombies, hitchhikers, and chocolate cake.”  Who doesn’t worry about zombies, hitchhikers, and chocolate cake?






March 9, 2010

Dancing and Friendship

carter waltz 

George’s father brought him to me because he was worried. He remembered middle school, and the close friends he made and kept through most of high school. Though both he and his friends moved on and in different directions, he knew how essential they were as catalysts for him to become independent of his parents.

George, 13, didn’t have a best friend. He didn’t have a group of friends that his father knew about. He was smart, courteous, respectful of people and things. He usually had a book with him. His father was also concerned that George might inevitably become known as a nerd.

I admit that I have not seen genetic research investigating whether nerdiness can be inherited. I predict that at some point, there will be a nature vs. nurture debate about it among academic intelligentsia. Among nerds. The issue of nerdism is not the topic of this post, but I would politely point out that George’s father just happened to be the only computer engineer in his working class family.

George’s father was also concerned that his child might have an autistic-spectrum disorder, and wanted a professional opinion.

When I spoke to George, I asked questions I usually ask of teenagers. I asked about depression, suicidality, substance use. There were no surprises in the answers to my usual screening questions. He was a happy, thoughtful kid without any worrisome activities. He agreed that he really didn’t have any friends. The claimed this didn’t bother him. He didn’t say that people didn’t like him, he didn’t complain about having no one to play with. He said he was content the way things were.

How do you get your 2-year old to taste new foods, when she doesn’t want anything that isn’t the right shade of white even on her plate? As far as she is concerned, there isn’t a problem growing to retirement age on milk, macaroni and cheese (made one very specific way only), plain white rice, and cookies. Some years ago, I read a research study that asked how many times you have to put a new food in front of a 2-year-old before she will spontaneously try it. On average, 30. That’s just an average, of course. Some were more adventurous and some took a lot longer than 30 times. One single, lonely, french-cut string bean every night. Seven nights a week for a month. And then she takes a reluctant nibble. And then she says she doesn’t like it.

Be the parent. You know what your child does not know. Maybe George is satisfied with his friendships as they are. Maybe he’s not depressed about it, lonely, isolated. Maybe he’s not suffering from a personality disorder or autistic-spectrum disorder. Maybe he just doesn’t know how helpful and rewarding a good friendship can be. He doesn’t know that it can be crucial to have somebody who completely agrees that the history teacher mumbles and that parents can be unbearably unreasonable. He doesn’t know that eventually his classmates will notice that he carries a book around.

Social skills are an old-fashioned dance. A few of our children need no coaching. They will ask somebody to dance and get out there in front of everyone making a perfect fool of themselves. The rest of us look on critically about the way they look or move, and secretly envious that they are willing to do it. We feel helpless and alone. We want this skill, but feel humiliated to admit we lack it. We don’t even know where to go to learn it. We do not believe it can be learned, and feel like it is a deep personality flaw. Because we believe it can’t be learned, any attempt appears to us as doomed to failure. So we don’t try. We hang out with a group of our pals and make fun of the kids actually having fun.

You now know that this isn’t a flawless oracle predicting our futures. After all, somewhere along the way you became a parent. Professionally speaking, that usually requires help. (Though we have the technology….)

I told George’s dad that I thought he was on a spectrum, but it wasn’t the Autistic Spectrum. Some people, especially starting around middle school, are particularly self-conscious about the possibility of social failure and rejection. We might not be able to teach them to love to dance. We can, however, teach them some dance steps. We can also be there to catch them when they fall.

I made some specific suggestions. If George wasn’t into sports—he wasn’t—he should sign up for an after-school program. He should be given a list of choices. In this local area, there are many choices that aren’t too costly. In his case, there were library programs and science and computer classes. There were also programs in which students like George can tutor other students in certain subjects. This can be really helpful for good students who get their homework done before they get home, and spend the rest of the day and evening playing video games or on the computer. In some schools, there’s still a chess club or a debate team. I suggested finding a program requiring some cooperative activity, where participants have to work together to make something or learn something. The group is the way to find others of about the same age with a common interest.

The next suggestion was to host one or several group gatherings. Don’t miss this opportunity to show those kids where George lives, the stuff he has in his room, the video games he plays. Remember, they are all nervously making fun of the popular kids on the dance floor. They don’t have enough perspective to realize that none of them know how to dance. Be the parent. As everyone shows up, keep a little log book of names, addresses and phone numbers—George won’t think of this. Don’t supervise, disappear into the background. But only after the pizza arrives.

The photograph is from my collection and is by Keith Carter.  It's called Waltz.

February 12, 2010

Honesty vs.. Hope: An Ethical Dilemma

wolf1
Lupus pilum mutat, non mentem

At our last visit, Franklin spoke to me in private.  “Will it get better?” he asked

“Will what get better?”

“My parents.”  His parents had recently been suggesting to him that his antidepressant medication cost should come out of his allowance and if he were more like his two younger brothers, star athletes and students, he would be costing them a lot less.  He needed to get away from them any way he could.  He played X-Box video games.  Given his ADHD, this was the perfect escape, and would hold his attention for hours.  But this bothered his parents quite a bit.  They didn’t feel like they were being responsible parents if they let him play video games for hour after hour.  So they decided that he was to play no more than 1 hour.

Most parenting authorities would agree with this restriction, I think.  I, too, think that it’s reasonable for parents to restrict the amount of time a kid is playing video games.  It’s reasonable to limit the time to 1 hour. 

But I know something else:  it’s completely arbitrary.  Yes, there are studies that show that increased screen time is correlated with obesity, social dysfunction, and other problems.  But at what duration do those problems suddenly occur?  Nobody knows or has looked at that.  Is 15 minutes safe?  What about 120 minutes?  Because I believe television is a drug, how much of a dose will cause some effect, and what dose will cause trouble?  Franklin may not have been familiar with the research in this field, but he know in his gut that the 1-hour limit was arbitrary, and that his parent picked it out of thin air.  He also knew that he was unnaturally thin, didn’t snack, got plenty of exercise, and that whatever social problems he had weren’t caused by his screen time.  His parents made another mistake.  They insisted that he reduce his video game time by hours.  They didn’t offer him any alternative ways to spend those hours.  He was doing well in his classes, and keeping up with his assignments.

When he spoke to me in private, he told of many little remarks made by his parents.  They weren’t directed at him, they weren’t meant to hurt his feelings.  They weren’t insults or denigrating.  They were, however, part of the family lexicon.  He recalled this statements in precise detail, and I don’t doubt him at all.  Sometimes they came when a parent was talking on the phone to a friend or relative, sometimes it was a statement between the parents, and sometimes it was something said sotto voce to one of his younger siblings.  Franklin heard them all, and he knew what they meant.  ‘We can’t go because Franklin….’  ‘Why can’t Franklin be more like you?  You never cause us any trouble.’

Families have a jargon all their own.  Big companies have this, the military has this.  Sometime restaurants do, too:  Adam and Eve on a raft famously meant poached eggs on toast.  And wreck ‘em was added if you wanted scrambled.  When his brothers fought, sometimes one would call the other Franklin; a parent would smirk.

So he asked me one of the hardest questions I have been asked.  He asked if it would get better.  The easy way out would have been to say one truth, ‘I don’t know.’  I can’t predict the future, so I would have fallen back on that dependable standard.  But he wasn’t really asking me for a prediction, such as the dates and times for the coming apocalypse, for example.  Just as so many parents do, he was asking my professional opinion.  Based on my training and experience, my intelligence and intuition, what did I really think?  Would it get better?

This is an ethical problem, too.  Do I make him feel better or do I tell him the whole truth as I know it, not just a statement that happens to be an accurate ‘I don’t know?’  When I ask my own doctors if something will get better and they say they don’t know, is this the whole truth?

I knew a more substantial truth than ‘I don’t know.’  I knew from my own life and from the families I have known since childhood, from the families of my parents’ friends in their retirement community.  And I knew from the children I have seen grow from babies to high school students.  Most parents have told me that their teenagers ‘were the same way’ when they were infants, maybe easily frustrated or easy to comfort, restless or relaxed.  In this way, personalities can be surprisingly stable.

In Franklin’s life, I had become about the only person he opened up to.  It was a great privilege and he deserved more than facile answers.  I told him once that I would always be honest with him.  I said, “No, I don’t think it will get much better.”  I don’t know if this was what he wanted to hear.  If I had sounded upbeat and tried to assure him that it was going to get better, would he have believed me?  How long would he give that prediction to unfold if it didn’t get better?  I suspect he expected the easy answer, ‘I don’t know.’ 
Though this was my best professional assessment, rolled into a single No, it wasn’t the whole truth, either.  Dealing with some of the most difficult kids, I can say confidently that even when we can’t change the difficult child, we can change how we understand them and deal with them in ways that make those interactions much less frustrating.  This increasingly educated and empathic approach often helps a lot in reducing the number and intensity of explosions.  In Franklin’s case, I found myself with a type of role reversal.  I told him what I often tell parents of particularly problematic kids.  Pick your battles carefully.  If you know that something will provoke an explosion, then whose fault is it when the inevitable happens?  Change your expectations of them, and that will cause you to change your expectations for yourself.  Be the grown-up.

I reviewed with him the situations most likely to cause battles.  I asked him the same questions I ask parents of difficult children.  What was your last fight about?  Did you win?  If you did, was it worth it?  Did the child learn a lesson and now won’t do that ever again?  (The answer is always no, by the way.)  Do you feel good about it?  Does the child feel good about you because of it?  I ask the same follow-up questions if they didn’t win the fight.  If it wasn’t worth it, if nothing was learned or gained by it, would you like to do it again?  If not, then don’t fight about it.  It takes two to make an argument.  Be the grown-up, be the first to walk away and say you’re sorry.  You may lose a fight but gain a child.

In Franklin's case, I counseled him to play the grown-up.  I suggested that he try to predict what the battles will be about, and decide carefully if they will be worth it.  I'm hoping that just having a plan will empower him and help to stabilize his relationship with his parents.

The Latin proverb at the top of the page means The wolf changes his coat, not his disposition.  Readers need only look as far as their own aging parents.  Are they very different from when you were a kid?  Do they treat you or talk to you so much differently?

April 15, 2009

A Mother's Concern: Forgetful and 15


Claire is 15, and she’s been a patient of mine for a couple of years. She’s very bright and has always been healthy. When I’ve seen her, she always asked articulate questions with an adult vocabulary. She never seemed conformist with high-school fashion or makeup. She seemed comfortable with me, though she generally avoided eye contact.

Her mom had just read my post about girls with ADHD, and telephoned. She said that her daughter was getting poor grades in school despite high aptitude. She often forgot her homework assignments and forgot to hand in the assignments she did. Her written work seemed randomly put together, with one idea not flowing naturally into the next.

Although this pattern had been noticed since she began elementary school, she has never been in trouble, and her excellent reading was always thought of as a major educational advantage.

Could this be ADHD, especially the inattentive type often found—and often missed—in girls? She seemed to meet some of the common criteria: performance notably below her potential, forgetfulness, disorganization, and her teachers often found her not paying attention. But that lack of eye contact and awkwardness in following and participating in a conversation could be symptoms of what is currently called Nonverbal Learning Disability, which is considered an Autistic Spectrum Disorder.

While these were possible, I wanted to be sure not to miss important other possibilities in this teenager. At her age, I’m particularly concerned about depression. Social isolation, bullying, harassment of some sort at school could be an issue. Is there an eating disorder? Is she hurting herself in some other way? Was there a boy the parents didn’t know about? What about alcohol or drug use?

I posed all of these questions to Claire's mother. She thought all were unlikely. They had a warm, open relationship and she didn’t think the child would hide much. Though teenagers can have very private lives as they try to find an identity independent from their parents, I thought the most important factor was the long history of behavior, observed very early in her school career. Even Claire joked with her friends about her being ‘spacey.’

Her mother wanted to know how to approach her.

Be completely open with her. Parents who aren’t usually find themselves defending their omissions or deceptions. This can have serious consequences for the credibility of the parent and the relationship with the teenager.

Tell her:
  • You read the post online, and show it to her.
  • We spoke on the phone and this plan was my idea.
  • I want to see her, to ask her opinion and to ask her screening questions.
  • I want to initiate a formal evaluation.
  • I will give questionnaires to her current and former teachers, but only to the teachers she likes.
  • Questionnaires will also go to her parents.
  • She will get a questionnaire so that she knows what questions are being asked and so she can evaluate herself.
  • She will be included in every part of the process. No decisions of any kind will be made without her.
  • All of the process, including that the evaluation is happening at all, will be completely confidential. It will not be a topic for conversation at the family dinner table, or with her siblings or friends.

It’s a mistake to assume that the teenagers who aren’t crying out for help don’t want help or wouldn’t accept help if offered. I don’t know yet if any of this will happen, or what the results will be. I’ll keep you posted.


The photograph above is by Paul Strand. It was taken in 1953.

February 28, 2009

Teenager, Failing and Depressed


Once you make it to your late teens, your parents occupy an odd place in your life. You’re still dependent on them for many basic things, but you don’t want them interfering in your affairs. Parents often have a more difficult time with this separation. They know that they are providing many things, and they feel that it’s appropriate to receive something in return. What, exactly? Love and affection, respect, courtesy all must be earned, and cannot be bought with room and board. Those of us who have been in the working world and have worked for mercurial bosses know that we don’t respect people just because they are in some kind of supervisory position. (At Harvard Business School, they taught about leadership by showing the movie Twelve O’Clock High—a fabulous movie to see for any reason and an effective teaching tool for this, too.) I’ve known him and his family for about 10 years.

His mother called me last night, worried. She said that there was a major blow up with J, and he said he needed to ‘go for a walk.’ He left the house several hours ago and isn’t answering his cell phone.

About 5 years ago or so, when he was 12 or 13, his parents divorced. He was the only child who seemed to be reasonably OK with this at the time, since he wasn’t getting along so great with either one at that moment. But he started getting a little more introverted at the time, until one night he took off. His parents were naturally very concerned, and the local police found him some hours later nearby. He said at the time that he just needed some privacy, and he didn’t know why everyone made such a big deal out of it. His parents brought him to me. He explained that he just needed a break from things going on at home. I worked out a plan with his parents. I gave him my home and cell phone number. I told him that if he needed to get away again, he should call me at any time, day or night, and I would come at get him and take him to Denny’s or someplace where I could call his folks and let them know he was all right, and then he and I could talk and work out a strategy that could help him. He found this helpful, he said. It was like a relief valve.

In general, I think every teenager should have at least one, maybe several, safe adults. Adults who can let them vent, or just accept them when their parents have pushed them into a corner. It could be lifesaving.

When his mother called back, he had returned. He wouldn’t talk to her but she suggested me and he agreed to come the following day.

He sat in the room with me. I told him that his mother had called me, and I told him everything the mother had told me. He said that he was in a deep hole academically. Though he was a senior with excellent grades, and his college applications were already out, he has not been doing his school assignments and is in danger of failing several classes. I asked how that could be possible given his record. He started to cry. He had been cutting class, not handing in his work, not participating in class when he was in class. I didn’t press the issue, which I thought was tangential, even though he and his parents thought it was the center of the problem. He knew that eventually there would be a reckoning, specifically when his midterm grades were given to his parents, but he couldn’t deal with this. As the semester went on, and he got further and further behind, it seemed more and more impossible ever to catch up, so he had no choice but to let this crash happen even as he saw it approaching. His grades came out, his parents confronted him, he admitted not doing the work and lying to them about it, and his parents grounded him for a long time, to learn a lesson about lying to them and to get him to focus on his work.

I told him I wanted to change the subject. I asked and he told me that he was also neglecting his friends, even spending less time with and attention to his girlfriend. He said, “I’m not doing any of the things I used to enjoy. They just don’t mean that much to me any more.” He wasn’t doing new enjoyable things, either. All of this coincided with his academic slide.

He denied feelings of overt sadness, and denied thoughts of self-harm. I explained that weeping 17-year-old young men have a hard time convincing me of their blissful happiness. Indeed, what he described so eloquently is called anhedonia, a state of indifference to pleasurable activities. It’s a sign of depression. I told him that I didn’t think the academic problem was making him depressed. It wasn’t his fault, I said. The depression had caused the academic problem.

We needed a plan. First, let’s try to treat the depression. I discussed medication with him, and we agreed on a prescription. It offered the best chance of relief in a reasonably rapid time frame. Next, I offered to intervene with the school, but he said this wouldn’t be necessary. He was already negotiating a make-up schedule for the work he missed. Next, a frequent schedule for follow up. Though I suggested he try to find a therapist he can trust and talk to, I wasn’t going to wait for that to kick in. Whenever I start someone on medication, I see them at least once a week. So he’ll be back next week with a progress report. Finally, I told him I would call his parents and ask them to un-ground him. He is punishing himself for this mess much more painfully than anything a parent can devise. And at his age, a major source of support is his friends. Now, at this troubled time, he needs them more than ever. His parents should embrace their help.

I discussed with him explicitly what I would like to tell his parents when I called them. We agreed on a plan. When I spoke to his mother, she was OK with the plan. I’m awaiting a call back from his dad.

J told me that he felt much better after the visit. I think it’s because at least there’s now a strategy to get through the crisis. It won’t be easy—he has a lot of work to do. But his parents are behind him and I’m behind him.